Supreme Court of Minnesota May 22, 1876 (State v. Hoag)

Berry, J.

This case must follow State v. Byrud (ante *32p. 29.) The first question certified arose upon an objection to the introduction of evidence under the indictment. The second question certified arose upon a motion for an instruction to the jury. As it does not appear that the defendants were convicted, the case does not fall within the provisions of Laws 1870, c.