Supreme Court of Iowa April 2, 1878 (Culver v. Wilbern Bros.)

Also known as

United States · · · 02-04-1878

Adams, J.

i. usvut: suretyship. We think that the transaction by which the defendants took up the original note was either a payment or purchase, and that in either case the defendants cannot maintain the plea of usury. What the defendants’ theory is does n0* Tery distinctly appear; but they speak of the note guy. as a substituted note.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.