Supreme Court of Minnesota June 6, 1881 (Furman v. Tenny)

Clark, J.

This was an action of replevin for a horse, brought before a justice of the peace, against the defendant Cornelius T. Fur-man, the plaintiff’s husband. The defendant Tenny was, on his own application, admitted to defend, and he set up in his answer that, as constable, he seized the horse on an execution against Mr.