Mississippi Supreme Court April 16, 1883 (Montgomery v. Evans)

Opinion.

Per curiam:

All the facts now undertaken to be set up by bill of interpleader were known to Montgomery when he answered the garnishment in the Chancery Court of Hinds county. If dissatisfied with the decree of that court he should have appealed. Mrs. Evans, having *360obtained a decree there, cannot, by bill of interpleader, be compelled to xelitigate.