Supreme Court of Minnesota June 14, 1883 (Shepard v. Pettit)

(xiljtllan, C. J.

On a former appeal brought by defendant, the light of plaintiff to recover was affirmed. On this appeal, brought |>y plaintiff, the only question raised is as to the amount which he is ' ntitled to recover. The court below allowed the value at the place f conversion, less the sum expended by defendant in preparing the gs for and bringing them to market.