Supreme Court of Alabama December 15, 1884 (Reynolds v. Collins)

CLOPTON, J.

It is insisted that the attachment is void, because the writ of garnishment, the service of which constitutes the levy, was served on the sheriff by a constable, instead of by the coroner. The writ of attachment is regular on its face, and was issued by an officer having jurisdiction, and the *97statutory affidavit preliminary to its levy by a constable, was made.