Supreme Court of Minnesota December 18, 1884 (D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Poket)

Mitchell, J.

The cause of action set up in the answer by way of counterclaim is a breach of plaintiff’s agreement to put a harvester in first-class order, for the purpose of enabling defendant to cut and bind his grain therewith. The only damage alleged is “loss of crops” by reason of not having the machine in condition to cut and save the same.