Supreme Court of Alabama December 15, 1885 (Williams, Deacon & Co. v. Jones)

STONE, C. J.

There is such a repugnancy between the original answer and cross-bill filed by Williams, Deacon & Co., and the amended answer and cross-bill subsequently filed by them, that we think the demurrer to it was properly sustained. The chancellor’s reasons for his ruling are strong and well put, and we could add nothing to them.