Supreme Court of Pennsylvania January 25, 1886 (Fouhy v. Pennsylvania R.)

Per Curiam:

The law is well settled, if facts have not been shown from which negligence may reasonably be inferred, the case should not he submitted to a jury, to infer arbitrarily and without evidence that there was negligence. If the bell had not been *380rung, the omission so to do might have been evidence of negligence.