Supreme Court of Minnesota December 1, 1886 (Bickford v. Johnson)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-12-1886
Vanderburgh, J.
The property in controversy is included in the chattel mortgages described in the answer. Several of these mortgages the plaintiff alleges to have been paid, others to be usurious, and one, for $1,100, to have been given without any consideration.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit