New York Supreme Court July 23, 1886 (Mills v. Kemochan)

Cullen, J.

I think it plain that the plaintiff was allowed to testify to payments made to defendant’s intestate personally. The plaintiff had testified to certain sales of the firm property and his receipt of the purchase money. He was then asked by his counsel, “of all the whiskey sold, what portion of the returns have you retained?” This question was objected to, but the objection was overruled.