Supreme Court of Pennsylvania October 31, 1887, No. 44, W. D. (Dougherty v. Mortland)

Per Curiam:

The charge, of the learned judge beloiv was an accurate and ■clear statement of the law of this case. Nor do we see any error in his rulings upon the offers of evidence.

It may be that the deed from James llortland to his son Elias-was a fraud upon the creditors of the former, and.