Supreme Court of South Carolina June 28, 1887, No. 2069 (Martin v. Patterson)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-06-1887

Opinion by

Mr. Chibe Justice Simpson,

The court say that in order to entitle a party to a specific performance of a parol agreement for the purchase of land, he must clearly show an agreement to purchase, which has been partly carried into execution on one side with the consent and approbation of the other, and this must consist of something more than simply paying a portion of the purchase money

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.