Supreme Court of Minnesota July 29, 1887 (D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Carpenter)

Vanderburgh, J.1

The evidence in the case is'sufficient to establish the finding of the jury that the plaintiff sold to the defendants, with warranty, a combined harvester and binder, in July, 1881, at the agreed price of $295; that the same was then delivered to them; *333that they turned out in part-payment a second-hand harvester owned by them, for which they were allowed $125 on the purchase,