The Superior Court of New York City May 18, 1887 (Stillings v. Smith)
Also known as
United States · · · 18-05-1887
Per Curiam.
Upon the facts as they were made to appear on the motion, the order is right and proper. If the appellant could have shown an additional fact, which within the authorities cited by him would have been a-bar to the motion, he should have done so.
The order should be affirmed with $10.00 costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of the learned judge at special term.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit