New York Supreme Court May 7, 1888 (Columbia Bank v. Ingersoll)

Van Brunt, P. J.

There is no doubt but that the order under which Watson, Karsch & Co. paid over the money in question to the sheriff was irregular. There seems to have been a studious suppression of the fact that a receiver of the judgment debtor had been appointed, and that the judgment debtor had therefore no power to consent to the entry of the order under which said payment was made.