Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 13, 1889, No. 93 (Van Horne v. Clark)

Per Curiam:

We are unable to see any valid objection to the competency of Ruth Clark as a witness. It is true, she was the defendant in the ejectment, and her father, from whom she derived title, was dead. She was not called to testify against his title, but in support of it; or, to speak with greater accuracy, to prove the consideration she paid for the land.