Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 13, 1889, No. 429 (Battles v. Sliney)

Opinion,

Mr. Chief Justice Paxson:

The first assignment alleges that the court erred in allowing an amendment to the declaration. The cause below was a feigned issue under the sheriff’s interpleader act. The amendment consisted in specifying certain articles levied upon by the sheriff, consisting of household goods, claimed by the plaintiffs below.