Michigan Supreme Court November 8, 1889 (Barnes v. Peet)

Campbell, J.

I concur in reversal, because I think that there is nothing to indicate that it was supposed any one but Barnes loaned the money on the note, and if it was delivered to him, as I think it clearly was, as indorsee, his liability to any one else for money due *401could not change such person or corporation into a contracting party, or make any but himself the holder.