New York Supreme Court February 11, 1890 (Ludington v. Garlock)

Also known as

United States · · · 11-02-1890

Merwin, J.

The rent for the occupancy up to the time the defendant left was paid. The claim of the plaintiff is that the tenancy continued for another month by reason of the failure of defendant to give a month’s notice of his intention to terminate the holding, in analogy to a tenancy from month to month. In Anderson v. Prindle, 23 Wend.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.