Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 26, 1890, No. 2 (McLenahan v. Andrews)

Per Curiam:

In the absence of any evidence to the contrary in the record, it must be assumed the learned judge was correct in saying, as complained of in the first specification : “ In their arguments, counsel seem, and properly too, to agree in this, that the sub* stance of the charges contained in the several counts of the dec*388laration, and upon which plaintiff bases her right to a verdict,'