Supreme Court of Alabama November 15, 1890 (Ware v. Seasongood, Menderson & Co.)

STONE, O. J.

The affidavit and bond for attachment are not set out in the transcript before us, but it is not shown that *154their absence was made a question in the Chancery Court. The attachment recites that they were made and given, and we suppose the recital is true. We will make no ruling on this question. See McKenzie v. Bentley, 30 Ala. 139; Smith v. Moore, 35 Ala. 16.