Supreme Court of Iowa October 29, 1890 (State v. Brendle)

Per Curiam.

On appeal to the district court, the defendant was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors in violation of law. His motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the court erred in admitting and refusing evidence, and in the instructions given, was overruled, and judgment entered upon the verdict. Defendant appeals.