New York Supreme Court December 28, 1891 (Clark v. Saugerties Savings Bank)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-12-1891
lead-opinion
Putnam, J.
The defendant claims that the judgment should be reversed because the court below erred in excluding evidence offered to show that the $500 for which plaintiff recovered was the property of her husband, William Clark.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit