Washington Supreme Court May 28, 1894, No. 1327 (Case v. Ham)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-05-1894

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

— This is an equity case. The respondents move to strike the purported statement of facts and certain testimony sent up with the transcript, on the grounds that the statement is insufficient under the law, and was not served on the respondents as required by statute.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.