Washington Supreme Court May 28, 1894, No. 1327 (Case v. Ham)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-05-1894
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
— This is an equity case. The respondents move to strike the purported statement of facts and certain testimony sent up with the transcript, on the grounds that the statement is insufficient under the law, and was not served on the respondents as required by statute.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit