Supreme Court of Minnesota May 8, 1894, No. 8692 (Oxford v. Nichols & Shepherd Co.)

Gtlfillan, G. J.

There was no evidence that would justify a finding of a .contract between the parties subsequent to the written contract. It could not be claimed that, with Exhibit D in force, *209there would be any basis for the action. All prior and contemporaneous negotiations and parol agreements on the matters covered by that contract were of course merged in it.