Supreme Court of North Carolina February 5, 1895 (Wilson Cotton Mills v. Randleman Cotton Mills)

A vbky, J.:

It is contended for the plaintiffs that while this Court correctly held that the judgment- could not be vacated

*648

unless by “ a direct proceeding to set it aside for fraud ” and that courts of equity must “ refuse aid in cases when their action would be tantamount to appellate jurisdiction ” exercised in the correction of errors of law, it erroneously concluded in violation of that