Supreme Court of Iowa October 17, 1895 (Hamilton Bros. v. Hartinger)
Also known as
United States · · · 17-10-1895
Given, C. J.
1 *92 *103 *8I. Plaintiffs contend that there was no valid levy of the attachment upon any personal property, because no written notice of such levy was given to the defendant, and- because the sheriff did not take any of said property into his custody, and therefore the plaintiffs are not liable to the defendant in damages for what was done to said personal property.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit