Superior Court of Pennsylvania July 16, 1896, Appeal, No. 32 (Doverspike v. Jewart)

Opinion by

Wickham, J.,

(after stating the facts as above set forth) :

Looking at all the evidence, there can be no reasonable pre*315tense for contending that the appellant ever received actual or even symbolical delivery of either of the rafts. His name or mark was not on the logs ; no sign was put np to indicate that the ownership was not in W. T. Jewart.