Oregon Supreme Court April 27, 1896 (Owens v. Snell)

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

1. It is contended that the plaintiff is a bona fide holder for value of the note in question, acquired before maturity, and that he can be affected in his title thereto and right of recovery only by showing that he had notice or knowledge of any fraud which attended its inception or induced its execution and delivery, and that it was manifest error, prejudicial