New Jersey Court of Chancery May 15, 1896 (Brown v. Murray)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-05-1896
Stevens, Y. C.
I think the obvious and proper reading of the clause in the policy of the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, in respect of which the present controversy has arisen, is this:
“ The said company does hereby promise and agree to and with the said assured [Alexander Shiras], his executors, administrators and assigns, well and truly to pay or cause to be paid the said sum insured to
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit