Montana Supreme Court October 25, 1897 (Snook v. Clark)

Pemberton, C. J.

The appellants contend that the evi dence is insufficient to justify the verdict.

Under this assignment, counsel for appellants argue that it was impracticable to maintain a fence or cattle guard at the *232point where the cattle got on the track of the-railroad. It is contended that a fence or cattle guard at this point would materially obstruct the county highway.