Supreme Court of Minnesota December 21, 1898, Nos. 11,377—(169) (Church v. Church Cementico Co.)

COLLINS, J.

Assuming, as we shall, for the purposes of this decision, and as asserted by plaintiff’s counsel, that William Church, plaintiff’s husband, was in the employ of Reiss Clarke for the year ending November 1, 1896, and that they were not copartners in business; and, further, that the evidence at the trial was ample to support a finding that an assignment of that part of Church’s salary