Supreme Court of Pennsylvania July 19, 1899, Appeal, No. 102 (Bowen v. Haupt)

Per. Curiam,

Our consideration of the evidence on which the plaintiff relied in the court below has satisfied us that there was no error in refusing his point recited in the first specification and in affirming defendant’s point recited in the second specification, and thereby instructing the jury, in the language of the latter, that “ under all the evidence in the case the verdict of the jury