New York Court of Appeals June 22, 1900 (Rochester & Honeoye Valley Railroad v. City of Rochester)

The judgment should be so modified that, after its recitals, the 2d clause shall read as follows: “

Second.

That the defendant, The City of Rochester, and its official authorities, have not, under the provisions of chapter 62 of the Laws of 1853, the right to lay out the proposed street across the land and tracks of the plaintiff, without compensation : ”

And so that its 4th clause shall read : “