Supreme Court of North Carolina April 3, 1900 (Durham Dyeing Co. v. Golden Belt Hosiery Co.)

Faircloth, C. J.

The defendant-manufactures hosiery goods and plaintiff contracted to dye defendant’s hosiery goods skillfully, satisfactorily' in quality, and up to the standard grade of similar work in other reputable dye works, and to pay any damage done to the goods, whilst in plaintiff’s possession, in the process of dyeing.

This action is brought to recover balance due for said work.