Supreme Court of North Carolina April 24, 1900 (Means v. Carolina Central Railroad)

Furches, J.

This case is before us for the third time, as may be seen in 122 N. C., 990, and 124 N. C., 574. The facts stated in this appeal are substantially the same as when here last (124 N. C., 574), and for that reason it is not necessary for us to- restate them.

The plaintiff’s intestate was killed before the passage of

*426

tlae Eellow Servant Act oí 1891 (chap.