Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York January 15, 1900 (Umfreville v. Manhattan Railway Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-01-1900
O’Brien, J.:
The plaintiff’s action is the usual one for an injunction and for damages for alleged trespass upon property.
In a separate defense, the defendants alleged that the plaintiff executed a consent in writing to the operation of the roads; and it is this document of which the inspection is sought.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit