Supreme Court of Georgia May 12, 1900 (North Rome v. Hall)
Also known as
United States · · · 12-05-1900
Lewis, J.
There being no error of law committed, and the testimony being sufficient to sustain the verdict, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial. The writ of error, being palpably without merit, must have been sued out for delay only, and damages are accordingly awarded.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit