City of New York Municipal Court April 15, 1900 (Podmore v. Bank for Savings)

Has gall, J.

Before arguing this appeal upon its merits, a motion to dismiss the same was brought to the attention of the court upon general grounds, the principal one of which was alleged laches, and a subsidiary one which appears to be indisposition of the respondent to accept inevitable results. That motion is denied.

Under the decision of the Appellate Term in Podmore v.