Supreme Court of Minnesota July 16, 1900, Nos. 12,183—(155) (Reeves & Co. v. Cress)

LOVELY, J.

This is the second appeal of this action. On the former review (73 Minn. 261, 76 N. W. 26), it was reversed for error in the reception of testimony. The suit is maintained to recover the purchase price of a threshing outfit, consisting of a Beeves separator, wind stacker, weigher, and feeder, conditionally sold by plaintiff to de-. fendants.