Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1901 (Hughes v. Martin)

Per Curiam.

The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to. pay the regular commission. We think the judgment awarded for such commission is correct.

Present: Scott, P. T., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.