Supreme Court of North Carolina December 18, 1902 (Harris v. . Quarry Co.)

CLARK and DOUGLAS, JJ., dissenting. *Page 400 There is error in the admission of the evidence to which exceptions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 are taken. The negligence complained of and alleged in the complaint is that defendant company required him to work under a boss, captain or superintendent, and that it was its duty, under their contract, to furnish a boss or superintendent to look after, to see to