Superior Court of Pennsylvania November 19, 1902, Appeal, No. 12 (Wible v. Philadelphia)

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

This case presents a single and very simple question, would the court have been justified in saying, as it was asked to say, “ That, under all the evidence, the verdict should be for the defendant?” or, in other words, could it say, as a question of law, based upon undisputed evidence, that defendant was not guilty of negligence ?