Supreme Court of Alabama February 13, 1902 (Tatum v. Hollis)
Also known as
United States · · · 13-02-1902
McCLELLAN, C. J.
— According to the averments of the plea the only claim that Tatum. & Black ever asserted to the rent was under their executory contract of purchase of the land from Gibson, and this, of course, was subject to Hollis’ right to redeem from Gibson as the purchaser and at the foreclosure sale.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit