Michigan Supreme Court September 17, 1902, Docket No. 155 (People v. Voorhis)

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). Counsel for respondent state their contention thus:

*401“ The requirement of the statute, when taken m connection with other provisions of the same act, prescribes a discriminating tax operating to the disadvantage of like products of other States when introduced into Michigan, and is therefore in effect a regulation in restraint of commerce among the States,