Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit April 9, 1902, No. 115 (Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co.)

lead-opinion

COXE, District Judge.

Infringement is the only question involved. The appellant contends that it does not infringe for two reasons, which are stated in the brief as follows:

“First Because it has no ‘mechanism substantially as described, whereby the brush is moved upward and forward into a position in front of the stretcher-bar.’ Second.