Superior Court of Pennsylvania January 20, 1903, Appeal, No. 197 (Johnson v. Groff)

Opinion by

William W. Pouter, J.,

This action is in replevin. The chattel taken under the writ was replaced by the bond filed by the defendant. The question to be determined was whether the plaintiff was entitled to the possession of the piano taken under his writ. If he had such right his damages would be measured by the value of the chattel at the time of its seizure under the writ.