Superior Court of Pennsylvania April 20, 1903, Appeal, No. 15 (Kinney v. Harrison Manufacturing & Boiler Co.)

Pee Cueiam,

The plaintiff’s statement is not good. It seems to combine two causes of action, one arising under a contract and the other under a tort. In the one, she claims $618 difference between the amount of the alleged contract for drums for boilers and what she paid therefor to other parties, and in the other, $2,000, by reason of a fraud perpetrated upon her.