Michigan Supreme Court December 22, 1903, Docket No. 65 (Kudner v. Bath)

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The defenses are that complainant can claim no lien against the property, (1) because Mr. Latourette, without notice of complainant’s rights, settled the balance due to Young under the order of the bankruptcy court; (2) that the complainant was not entitled, under his assignment, to a lien for services performed by him after Mr.